Brian Hayes MEP






More Photos

Follow me on Twitter

Like my Page on Facebook

Hayes welcomes Central Bank action on variable mortgages

Hayes welcomes Central Bank action on variable mortgages

 Brian Hayes MEP today welcomed the news that the Central Bank of Ireland would introduce measures that require banks to inform their variable mortgage holders every year about alternative products on offer. These measures were communicated to Mr. Hayes in a letter from the Governor of the Central Bank, Philip Lane, following his calls for simpler switching procedures.

Central Bank

“It is welcome that the Central Bank is carrying out these measures to improve transparency of variable mortgage products. The Central Bank sees that mortgage switching is a vital tool to a well-functioning mortgage market and the more they can do to ensure consumers have the right information about better mortgage offers the better.

“This will be the first time that banks will have to communicate annually a summary of alternative products on offer and publish on its website its policy for setting variable mortgage rates. It is important that this information is communicated to people in a clear and understandable way. Otherwise, customers are often left in the dark about the benefits of switching mortgage products or provider.

“However, I do still believe that the Central Bank needs to develop a specific code of conduct on switching. And I also believe that the government needs to bring in standalone legislation to establish a simple switching procedure, similar to what was done in Italy.

“We must recognise that there is still a great lack of competition in the mortgage market. Variable mortgage rates are still too high. We need to find ways to ensure that foreign banks can come into our mortgage market and compete with the current market players. To develop that competition, I believe that switching must be a key component of our mortgage market. We currently have very low switching rates and this keeps the market less competitive.

“In Northern Ireland there is approximately one mortgage provider per 180,000 people. In Great Britain there is approximately one mortgage provider per 700,000 people.  In the Republic of Ireland there is one mortgage provider per 920,000 people. This shows the dominance of the five main lenders in Ireland.

“I believe we need to stimulate a more competitive mortgage lending environment, particularly with a view to encouraging reasonably priced long-term fixed rate mortgage products. In most other Eurozone countries, you can get a long-term fixed mortgage rate of 15 or 20 years for less than 3.5%.

“In Ireland, only Bank of Ireland offers a 10 year fixed rate mortgage. Other than that, there is hardly any competition in the mortgage market beyond rates of a 5-year duration. There is a culture of variable borrowing in Ireland and this will only change if competitive long term rates are available.”

The West heaves a sigh of relief as democracy makes a step forward in Turkey

The West heaves a sigh of relief as democracy makes a step forward in Turkey

Opinion piece by Brian Hayes MEP published in the Irish Independent on Monday 18th July 2016

In Turkey, shortly after midnight local time on Saturday, tanks moved onto the streets of Istanbul and Ankara. The sound of gunfire was heard across both cities and military jets streaked across the night sky over both cities. An old-style military coup attempt was under way.

By morning, the coup was effectively over, the ringleaders were rounded up and more than 6,000 people are now detained.

Large sections of the judiciary seem to have been removed as the finger is pointed at Fethullah Gulen and his movement.

At this stage, it’s unclear whether Turkey might reintroduce the death penalty as it faces threats on all sides and from within.

What is most significant from a Western perspective was that all sides in Turkey, be they pro- or anti-President Erdogan, seemed totally opposed to the coup.

It simply didn’t have support from the start.

Turkey remains on a high state of alert as the implications of this coup attempt for the wider security of the region come into sharp focus.

By Saturday morning, when it was clear that the coup had failed, Europe and the West looked on with utter relief. Had this gone the wrong way, the outcome for Turkey and indeed for the delicate balance of power in the war-torn Middle East could have been devastating.

What’s obvious is that the Turkish people want to change their government exclusively by means of the ballot box. It was a test of Turkish democracy and the fact the opposition sided with the government is a healthy sign for the long-term.

That’s not to say that Turkey is a liberal democracy. Nobody can argue that it is. But one unintended consequence of the coup’s failure may well be that it helped to bind the country together in a lasting way.

Yes, of course Turkey must have a strong relationship with Europe, but it must also show that it understands our values of democracy and human rights. Its embryonic commitment to democracy took a big step forward this weekend.

Turkey is too big and too important to the EU for these events not to be significant to all our lives. It’s a regional power player situated between the Middle East and Europe. A type of enormous economic and military buffer. A crucial player in the longer term sustainability of Europe, from the migration issues across the Mediterranean to our collective economy.

The instigators of the coup made a fatal error. They failed to neutralise senior politicians. The president called on citizens to take to the streets to save his government. The streets of Istanbul and Ankara, which had been almost empty, suddenly became crowded with cars and protesters. Crucially for the government, the police appear to have stayed loyal.

Turkey has had a long history of military coups and political interventions by the military. The military sees itself as the guardian of Turkey’s constitution and the secular legacy of Turkey’s national hero, Kemal Ataturk. President Erdogan and his Islamist-leaning AK Party have been setting a different political direction for Turkey.

He is very much in the nationalist authoritarian mould of political leaders.

In many respects, he resembles President Putin of Russia. He has clamped down hard on political dissent and gradually introduced extremely oppressive media controls. These are big issues for the EU.

In recent years, Erdogan has been projecting himself as a regional strongman. Turkey, of course, has serious internal political tensions associated with its Kurdish minority population. The government also took a strong anti-Assad stand, allowing arms supplies and other supports to flow to dissident groups inside Syria. Turkey also allowed its country to be used as a transition route for jihadi fighters from all over Europe. In recent months, Turkey itself has become a target for Isil terror attacks.

As a member of Nato, Turkey has the largest standing army of any Nato country. Of necessity, Turkey is also a partner of the EU in controlling the flow of refugees and economic migrants coming into Europe. Its government has driven a hard bargain with the EU in recent months.

If anything, the failed coup is likely to increase the authority of the president.

The Turkish economy, which is heavily dependent on the tourist sector, will be badly hit by recent events – putting jobs and livelihoods at risk.

The greater risk is that Turkey may be sucked into the wider instability that is now such a feature of the Middle East.

A stable Turkey is of critical concern to the EU. Turkey has a population of 80 million people. If Turkey became destabilised, it would pose a massive danger to the EU and the entire region. Dialogue and deal-making must continue with Turkey.

During the British EU referendum, one of the scares raised was the possible accession of Turkey to the EU. And while Europe will continue to engage on the question of Turkey joining the EU, the weekend’s events have made that even more remote then it was before.

Turkey will not be joining the EU anytime soon.

MEPs call for ‘Street Pricing’ policy in EU airports

MEPs call for ‘Street Pricing’ policy in EU airports

Fine Gael MEP Brian Hayes has today (Sunday) called for the introduction of ‘street pricing policies’ across European Airports. The Dublin MEP believes shops and restaurants should be required to charge prices comparable with similar shops on the street. Mr Hayes together with colleagues from across Europe initiated a procedure in the European Parliament requesting action by the European Commission.

14-10-22 Brian Hayes portrait STR-6

“Every year millions of European Citizens are ripped off by the exorbitant prices charged by retailers and restaurants in European airports. The cost of basic items has always been an issue in airports.”

“I believe a fair street pricing policy needs to be introduced. Shops and restaurants in airports have a monopoly. Soft drinks are often €1.50 more expensive, a standard breakfast can cost in the region of €15 and chocolate bars can be 50C or €1 more expensive. I received one complaint where a bottle of water and a cheese sandwich cost €8.20. European travellers are clearly being ripped-off.”

“In the US a number of airports have signed up to a voluntary code of practice on retail and restaurant prices. I believe a similar code of practice should be established by the European Commission with European Airport authorities encouraged to participate. That is why I and other colleagues from all political groups in the European Parliament have requested action on this issue by the European Commission. ”

“If shops on the street sold products at these prices, consumers would avoid them. This is not always possible in our airports. Once you pass through security it can be several hours before you reach your destination. Passengers are effectively forced into paying excessive prices. It is time that a fair pricing policy is introduced in our airports” concluded Mr Hayes.

Why this Dáil may actually grasp the nettle of higher education funding

Why this Dáil may actually grasp the nettle of higher education funding

Article by Brian Hayes MEP published in the Irish Times 14th July 2016

Doing the right thing in Irish politics frequently takes a lot of courage, but just sometimes requires a bit of good luck along the way. Richard Bruton may have stumbled across some good luck in trying to resolve the thorny issue of funding higher education in Ireland. For it is the perennial subject that every Minister for Education kicks into the long grass. Like national pension policy, it is always an issue for the next administration.


And despite the narrative that this Dail cannot or will not make difficult decisions, in a funny way the current composition of Dáil Éireann makes it possible for lasting reform in this area.

Two interesting things happened this week when Peter Cassells published his report.

Firstly Richard Bruton made it clear that the report is now very much the property of the new Education Committee. Because the government doesn’t have a Dail majority, the real influence is now in the Dail Committee rather than around the cabinet table.

The second interesting thing of the week was the very constructive response of Fianna Fáil and especially their new Education Spokesperson Thomas Byrne. Byrne deserves credit for refusing to simply play politics on the issue. And as he rightly pointed out all parties, including Fine Gael, have a duty to state their preference rather than hide behind the report.

Richard Bruton cannot by himself or by weight of parliamentary arithmetic decide this issue. He must work with the new education committee. The fact that the report has been published so early in the life of this Dail is another piece of good fortune.

The danger for opposition figures in education has always been to over promise and that especially is the case in the area of funding for higher education. FF have shown a lot of backbone this week in their response to the Cassells Report.

Eight years ago as the FG Education Spokesperson I set out in a green paper why a new model of funding for higher education was needed. At the time I proposed a graduate tax, where a graduate paid a contribution up to 30% of the cost of their education into a ring fenced fund for higher education. The more expensive a course, like medicine for instance, meant that you paid more. But you only paid when you could afford it.

The contribution was made over 10 years and only after a graduate reached a salary threshold. Crucially that new system got rid of college fees upfront, fees that had nearly doubled over the last eight years. Of course there were problems with the scheme I proposed. But the graduate tax idea is not a million miles away from the student loans system proposed in the Cassells report. In fact over the last decade countries like the UK and Australia have introduced student loans, so we could learn a lot from their experience over that time.

I argued at the time that if we were asking young people to contribute to their education, it could revolutionize the relationship between college and students. Students would correctly demand more from their colleges and lecturers given they would be paying for part of it.

It’s also about time that we recognized that the introduction of free fees in the 1990s has made very little difference in terms of helping students from disadvantaged backgrounds. A new funding solution could do something significant for those poorer students that need more support to get to and stay in college.

The current funding arrangements for our universities and Institutes of Technology is utterly dysfunctional and has to be reformed. We simply cannot go on with more of the same.

The sector is being held together by a financial shoe string and is close to collapse. Looking in from the outside it’s all about numbers. In 1980 20% of the age cohort went to college, now it’s 60%. The highest level of participation in higher education of any member state in the EU.

In my view if a new funding arrangement can be found, it then allows a genuine debate to occur on the type of third level sector we need. Reforms on course quality and content, more student contact hours, helping students from poorer backgrounds with proper maintenance support, demanding that universities collaborate, offering pathways to meet labour force needs in new technologies and emerging business opportunities.

The status quo is not good enough. Simply ratcheting up every year or so the annual third level registration fees is no way to fund higher education and in fact acts as a barrier to entry for many potential students. The real scandal in Irish education is disadvantage, especially at primary level and post primary level where much greater levels of funding are required.

My proposal for higher ed still required a massive contribution from the state, but also a reasonable contribution from graduates who benefit from the education they receive and as a consequence, have much higher earning potential during their life. Peter Cassells also proposed in his report an additional contribution from employers towards the sector – this also should form some part of the overall funding solution.

Post crises Ireland at a political level, must have the capacity and show the willingness to confront problems – rather then run away from them. If we have learnt anything from the crises years it’s the need for honest debate. Politics can no longer be about the lowest common denominator as parties compete against each other in a pretend contest, where pretend options are presented to the electorate. This issue might give us some tangible proof of new politics?

Populism the main stumbling block to TTIP as negotiations enter 14th round – Hayes

Populism the main stumbling block to TTIP as negotiations enter 14th round – Hayes

EU and US should complete TTIP deal by the end of this year

Brian Hayes MEP today said that the main stumbling block in an agreement on TTIP is the populist positions that many political figures against a deal. Mr. Hayes urged EU and US negotiators to speed up progress and work towards an agreement by the end of the year. The two sides meet in Brussels this week for the 14th round of negotiations.


“We have seen with the result of the UK referendum the damaging effects of populist politics. I hope this gives us a wakeup call in Europe and we can now push ahead with the real jobs and growth agenda. Finding an agreement on TTIP is a key part of Europe’s future growth agenda.

“We should not let populists take a hold of TTIP like they did with the Brexit debate. We need to look at the facts and figures and it is clear that the economic benefits for Ireland and the EU are enormous from a potential deal. A recent EU study says Ireland will gain 1.4% in GDP from the deal.

“EU and US negotiators should speed up their talks and find an agreement before the end of this year. The longer this is allowed to linger on, the more chance that populists will have to hijack any deal.

“There are still serious issues on the table and a lot of technical work is needed. In all these negotiations, nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. The key point on the EU side is that we do not lower our standards in favour of US standards – that point is vital in terms of food safety and regulatory standards. We have been assured by EU negotiators that our standards will not be eroded. I want to be clear that this is a red line that we must not cross.

“Populists continuously produce scare tactics that our standards will be eroded but the EU is never going to sign up to a deal that would for example, change our rules in favour of US hormone treated beef. This will simply not happen.

“I do agree that there is a serious need for a real and open public debate on TTIP. This will be the biggest bilateral trade deal ever and it is clearly going to have a big impact on people’s lives. I firmly believe the potential benefits are huge for Ireland but it is of course right and proper that we engage with citizens and provide forums for real debate.”

May’s victory will force the UK to get on with Brexit

May’s victory will force the UK to get on with Brexit

Article by Brian Hayes MEP which was published in the Irish Independent on Tuesday 12th July 2016

On both sides of the Irish Sea right now there seems to be an incredible amount of raw politics going on for this time of the year. While Enda Kenny has to deal with his own problems in Dublin, in London yet another act from the unfolding post Brexit drama has played out in both dramatic and bizarre fashion. It would seem that this script is fresh from a Jeffrey Archer novel.

The Tory leadership contest has come to a shuddering halt. How a relatively new and completely untested MP could effectively end up going head to head for the most senior position in British politics, seemingly unprepared for the battle ahead is beyond comprehension.

The entire events surrounding David Cameron’s departure and the leadership contest is really quite amazing even by Tory standards of backstabbing and conspiracy. I’m sure that both Michael Gove, he of total backstabbing fame himself, and his latest victim the hapless former Mayor of London, can only stare into the sky’s wondering what’s happened and could it all be true.

Two weeks ago, when the EU leaders of the 27 member states met in Brussels, they made it clear to the British that after electing a new Prime Minister they expected to see movement on article 50. That’s the article that triggers the formal opening on the EU/British negotiation on Brexit.

Theresa Mays unexpected coronation yesterday, has suddenly moved Brexit to the foreground of EU politics much earlier than expected and will put pressure on all sides to get on with the divorce settlement. The only question now is when will article 50 be invoked? She has said 2017. But the EU might not be happy for such a long period. And that’s where the problem is – she can’t move on the issue until she has some idea of what the final settlement might look like.

And that’s where Enda Kenny comes into the picture. What Ireland needs now in the middle of all this uncertainty is the Taoiseach on the pitch dealing with the implications of this settlement? The next year is the crucial year for our interests as a country to be highlighted and understood at every level in the EU. Enda Kenny is well positioned for that work.

Up until yesterday two things were continuously mentioned in the EU institutions here in Brussels.

One was that the British needed time to elect a new leader and set out a plan to leave the EU. Most EU leaders were keen to let the British mull over the implications of Brexit. Secondly, people here were still talking about a second vote, hoping beyond hope that if the British had experienced the cold winds of recession, they might think again and re run the referendum.

Well such European hopes are well and truly dashed now. Although in questions yesterday, Theresa May was careful not to rule anything out, she was very clear to say at the same time – that Brexit was Brexit.

There will be no early general election in the UK. Theresa May as the new PM will now have to unite her party quickly, divided after three decades of internal fighting over Europe, behind her leadership. But principally she will have to deal with the upfront economic clouds that will face Britain from jobs to investment – the tailwinds of which will undoubtedly affect us.

It won’t be plain sailing as Britain’s isolationist position in a globalized and complicated world plays out. The task of Enda Kenny, the government, the opposition – in fact all of us here who work here in the EU institutions must be to protect Ireland’s interests in the most uncertain of times.

EU Commission intervenes in German wage law which penalises Irish haulage industry – Hayes

EU Commission intervenes in German wage law which penalises Irish haulage industry – Hayes


Dublin MEP, Brian Hayes has today (Sunday) welcomed the European Commission’s decision to issue infringements against Germany over their minimum wage legislation that heavily penalises Irish hauliers on German roads.


“In January 2015 the German Government introduced a minimum wage of €8.50.  The legislation not only applies to people living in Germany but also for international truck drivers who are passing through Germany. From the moment a truck drivers enters Germany to the moment they leave they must be paid the German minimum wage.”

“While the Irish minimum wage is already above the new German rate at €9.15, the problem is compliance. The legislation requires that anyone stopped on the roadside must produce contracts of employment, payslips, records of working hours and even bank statements. Irish hauliers must have this information in order to prove they are complaint. Penalties for non-compliance can be as high as €30,000.”

“This legislation is impacting the Irish Road Haulage industry with companies having to ensure there drivers have all the necessary paper work when commencing work in mainland Europe. You can have a situation where an Irish truck driver is working on the continent for a two week period. They won’t have access to payslips or timesheets until they return to Ireland. It is an administrative nightmare for Irish companies.”

“I strongly welcome the decision by the European Commission to issue infringements against Germany. This is not about the minimum wage – that is a good thing. It’s about enforcement. Why include foreign truck drivers in the legislation? No other EU country does so. The legislation has effectively created a barrier to free trade.”

“We should not forget that 98% of all Irish exports leaves through our ports and then on by road to their destination. Mad barriers to trade, such as this, must be challenged as a means of preventing the free movement of trade” concluded MEP Hayes.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.